Truth Alliance Newsletter Signup
     Follow Us   |   Truth Alliance RSS Link     Truth Alliance Facebook Link     Truth Alliance Channel     Truth Alliance Live Documentaries
Search

Republican Jewish Coalition Bars Ron Paul From Presidential Debate, Saying He's Too "misguided and extreme"

By Matt Welch | Reason.com | Dec. 1, 2011

On Wednesday, Dec. 7, the Republican Jewish Coalition will host a presidential-candidates forum featuring Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum. Not invited is the GOP candidate currently polling around third in New Hampshire and second in Iowa: Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas). The explanation:

Paul was not invited to attend the RJC's candidates forum because the organization - as it has stated numerous times in the past - "rejects his misguided and extreme views," said [RJC Executive Director Matt] Brooks.

"He's just so far outside of the mainstream of the Republican party and this organization," Brooks said. Inviting Paul to attend would be "like inviting Barack Obama to speak."

Link via the Twitter feed of an approving Jamie Kirchick.

Brooks gave a more detailed critique of Ron Paul back in May:

"As Americans who are committed to a strong and vigorous foreign policy, we are deeply concerned about the prospective presidential campaign of Congressman Ron Paul. While Rep. Paul plans to run as a Republican, his views and past record place him far outside of the Republican mainstream. His candidacy, as we've seen in his past presidential campaigns, will appeal to a very narrow constituency in the U.S. electorate. Throughout his public service, Paul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision for the U.S. and our role in the world. He has been a virulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure in Congress*. Most recently Paul gave an interview in which he voiced his objection to the recent killing of Osama Bin Laden.

Brooks added, "We certainly respect Congressman Paul's right to run, but we strongly reject his misguided and extreme views, which are not representative of the Republican Party."

Weird punctuation in the original.

So what are these "extreme views"? Over at The Huffington Post, Dovid Efune, the director of The Algemeiner Journal and Gershon Jacobson Foundation, offers an explanation:

Paul's positions on Israel have been almost uniformly derided. Whilst claiming to be non-interventionist on the issue, he has routinely adopted Arab talking points on Israel, even comparing Gaza to 'a concentration camp.' His Isolationist mantra may appeal to fiscal conservatives, but in the real world its implementation would create a global power vacuum that would likely be filled by supporters of Israel's enemies.

Anti Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman has a perhaps unintentionally interesting take about Paul, U.S. politics, and Israel:

with the exception of Ron Paul, there is not much difference between the parties

And no orthodoxy-definition would be complete without David Frum:

Of the 8 candidates competing for the Republican presidential nomination, 7 declared themselves intense supporters of the State of Israel, the sole exception being crank no-hoper Ron Paul.

I'm no expert on Ron Paul's Israel views, and I reserve the right to be outraged later by what I don't know now, but what I find interesting here is the namecalling-to-content ratio. Here, let's count it out:

Name-calling: 1) "misguided and extreme," 2) "so far outside of the mainstream," 3) "like...Barack Obama," 4) "will appeal to a very narrow constituency," 5) "dangerous isolationist vision," 6) "uniformly derided," 7) "claim[s] to be non-interventionist," 8) "Isolationist," 9) "differen[t]," 10) "crank."

Content: 1) "virulent and harsh critic of Israel," 2) "voiced his objection to the...killing of Osama Bin Laden," 3) "routinely adopted Arab talking points," 4) "compar[ed] Gaza to 'a concentration camp," 5) "would create a global power vacuum that would likely be filled by supporters of Israel's enemies."

Looking at the five content items, 1) is supported only by 4); 2) intentionally left out the phrase "legal method of," 3) is a general and largely contentless insult, 4) is a discrete piece of hyperbole that rubs my literalist heart the wrong way, too (though the full quote contains two qualifiers: "Palestinians are virtually in like a concentration camp"); and 5) is the Transitive Property run amok, though it does at least hint at the real-world question/critique of what, exactly, replaces hegemonic American responsibility for world affairs, and which bad actors are more likely to do badder things.

Does this, plus Paul's principled rejection of all foreign aid, his relentless espousal of the "blowback" theory of terrorism, and his negligence in allowing to appear under his name during the first Clinton administration some newsletter conspiracy theorizing about (among other things) the 1993 World Trade Center bombing being a "setup by the Israeli Mossad" enough to disqualify him for the grownups' table on foreign policy?

Well, I'm neither Republican nor Jewish nor a member of a Coalition, so the immediate event is not my call (though I do believe that dissonance is more illuminating than seven-part harmony). That said, this seems to me more of an attempt to draw boundaries around acceptable policy discourse than any active concern that President Dr. Ron Paul would be actively anti-Israel or anti-Semitic. The fact that he is a political outlier on an effectively bipartisan U.S. foreign policy that has become increasingly expensive and unpopular strikes me as a count in favor, not against. And nothing Paul said at last month's largely grotesque American Enterprise Institute foreign policy debate struck me as more objectionable than Mitt Romney's grovel that his first overseas trip as president would be to Israel.

Some other bullet-pointed observations and gratuitous commenter bait:

* The New York Sun editorial board, not known for its unfriendliness toward Israel, defended Paul both from charges of anti-Semitism and foreign policy insanity last year.

* Here's how quickly Paul's anti-interventionist rhetoric can be turned into charges of "anti-Semitic arguments," courtesy of Ben Stein. (Slightly less inflammatory accusations from David Horowitz circa March 2007. UPDATE: And, thanks to commenter Ken E., a considerably more inflammatory accusation from the Horo show this February: "Ron Paul Is A Vicious Anti-Semite and Anti-American and Conservatives Need To Wash Their Hands of Him.")

* Some Republicans tried to bar Paul from all debates back in May 2007 on grounds that his overall foreign policy views were "just so off the wall and out of whack."

* Here's Paul himself talking to then-Reasoner David Weigel in May 2007, in response to charges of old newsletter "anti-Semitism."


Related

Ron Paul: Bitcoin could 'destroy the dollar'
Ron Paul Speaks At Ken Cuccinelli Rally
Ron Paul: What Was Not Said About Iraq
Ron Paul Warns of Martial Law and Economic Collapse
Has The Tide Turned Against the Warmongers?
Ron Paul Squares Off Against MSNBC's Alex Wagner in Explosive Interview
Ron Paul Launches Online TV Channel
Assange: 'I am a big admirer of Ron Paul'
NSA Domestic Spying “Built On Lies”
Ron Paul says TV venture contributes to the 'cause of liberty'

Tags

Ron Paul, Republican Jewish Coalition

Comments
By ronpaulfreedom1 on Saturday, December 3, 2011 @ 6:45 PM
Any of the Canadates that would attend this Jewish coalition debate after they labled Ron Paul a anti Semite isn't worth thier salt anyway..No one should attend this as its just immoral to treat another Canadate this way
Anti Semite?..Everyone in the Debates know what a Humble man Ron Paul is and they all should stepdown..All Americans know Ron Paul is not anti semite .He has alot of Jewish , Black, Asian , Mexicans, Indians people from all walks of life voting for him..We as a Nation Can't afford to give foriegn aid to any country ..he isn't Singling out Israel..Or any one else..He's going to bring the troops home, We can't Continue these wars we are bankrupt and Just who does this Jewish coalition think pays for all of this? We the American tax payers, We are struggling because of all this and many have no jobs ..they have lost thier homes. Many have no food to eat..Now i see the Jews in a Completley Different light..How much money is Israel giving to us in our time of need?..We have always given them Billions of dollars every year..We have spilled our blood for Israel..Our families have died for Jews..So where is Israel's money to help us?Israel wouldn't give us or anyone a penny..they are a greedy people....Ron Paul wants to bring all the troops home..because we are Bankrupt..this has nothing to do with Israel..Obama has over thrown heads of state that had peace treaties with Israel and has set up hasbulla and Alkaida groups that are now bombing Israel all the other Canadates have said they will continue this..Only Ron Paul will pull our troops out and this is only a really big help to Israel..Now the Jews and thats what i will call them from now on..they will have to earn my respect back..These Jews have angered milliona of Americans by ousting Ron Paul and don't deserve our respect anymore..I will write Ron Pauls name on the Ballot come election time..I won't vote for anyone else..they are all the same and will keep up the military industrial complex and all foriegn aid..so there is no Difference in Obama and Newt Gingrich or Mit romney..Gingrich is a man from hell just like Obama..If you want Ron Paul to be our president start using cash and write his name Ron Paul 2012 on all your money..It changes hands fast..Jews know this best..Write his name in on the ballot don't let the nomination if he doesn't get it stop you from voting your Conscience and let the chips fall where they may..I truley Believe with the bills the Senate has passed and executive orders Obama has passed ..we will be in a Cival war if Ron Paul isn't the president....Only going back to The Oath they all swore can make our nation great again..We should never allow our blood to be spillied for countries that can't and won't even try to get along..I have a little brother in the Navy and Marines and a Nephew in the Airforce..None of our Military believe in what they are doing..that is why Ron Paul gets more money from our Military than all the Canadates combined Including Obama..Its time we as Americans stand up for our military and bring them home..Obama lied and sasid he would..Gingrich and the rest of them will just continue this maddness..Its all about stealing all the natural resources of the entire world..Thats why we are now in 5 countries in Africa and Bombing Uganda...The Jewish Coalistion should pack thier bags and go back to Israel they have no respect for anyone..In fact Most of the banks that were bailed out with our tax money are Jew owned..I never thought i of all people would feel this way..but after what they have done to Ron Paul I just have no respect for them..They have used and used Americans to fight thier fights and give them money..Well we have nothing left to give..You disgraced a very wonderful mans name and millions are mad at you..So when people start treating you like crap you will know why..You also have no excuse for what you have done..

By ronpaulfreedom1 on Saturday, December 3, 2011 @ 6:55 PM
Ron paul or bust !!!!..Jews go back to Israel..we don't need you here..You disrespected a very great man..Go back where you belong..you don't stand for our american Constitution so you have the freedom to leave..If there is a real revelution ..i'm betting you will wish u had left!!!

Only registered users may post comments.
© Copyright 2007-2013 Truth Alliance inc. All Rights Reserved